Vice President of U.S. Operations Enbridge, Brad Shamla, responds to a recent piece and explains why facts are key in understanding the need for pipeline projects like Enbridge’s Line 3 project.
Fact: The recent decision by the Minnesota Court of Appeals on the adequacy of the Final Environmental Impact Statement, or FEIS, affirmed eight of the nine disputed aspects of the analysis and identified only one issue for further analysis. While disappointing to Enbridge, it is hardly the setback the writer would lead you to believe.
Read more – Duluth News Tribune