David Holt: How to move forward after Gulf spill

The following op-ed from David Holt, President of Consumer Energy Alliance, appeared on The Daily Caller website here.

May 17, 2010   As we are still sifting through all of the information about the causes of the tragic Deepwater Horizon incident in the Gulf of Mexico, experts are tirelessly working around the clock to contain the spill and clean-up the affected area. Americans rightfully expect all appropriate actions to be taken to move forward and repair the Gulf Coast following this tragic accident – including learning what went wrong to ensure that this never happens again – as we have done in the past and will continue to do in the future.

Clearly this rare accident was not an inevitable byproduct of oil production and Americans shouldn’t rush to judgment on offshore energy production. We should focus on: 1) finding out what went wrong; 2) fixing it and ensuring that it never happens again; and 3) determining the appropriate path forward.

Despite this tragic incident, the facts on offshore production still remain the same – America needs more oil and natural gas supplies to meet the demand in the coming decades and significant gains will continue to be made in developing new technologies to explore and develop our own energy resources.

In the same way that this accident in the Gulf is unacceptable, our country’s current energy situation – where we import well over half the oil we consume — is simply unsustainable. If Americans are serious about developing their own energy resources and reducing dependency on foreign imports, offshore production must be part of the solution. In fact, unless we want to import more than 80 percent of our oil (and all of the geopolitical risks that come with that),we must find a safe and efficient way to continue to develop our offshore resources.

Offshore production is a significant source of oil and gas for the United States. According to the Minerals Management Service, approximately 43 million leased acres along the nation’s Outer Continental Shelf account for about 15 percent of America’s natural gas production and 27 percent of America’s oil production. Each year, those efforts help produce an average of 600 million barrels of oil and 4.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. How much is that? Well, in comparison the United States imports roughly 550,000 million barrels of oil each year from Saudi Arabia.

Recent estimates indicate there could be as much as 3.8 billion barrels of oil and 21.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in the eastern Gulf and another 3.8 billion barrels of oil and 15.1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas on the Atlantic coastline between Delaware and Florida. However, if some in Congress get their way and a new moratorium is instituted, all of that American energy will be inaccessible and our nation’s energy security and economy will continue to be left to the whims of foreign, unstable governments that do not have America’s best interests in mind.

At Consumer Energy Alliance, a broad alliance of both traditional and renewable sources of power, we support a diverse energy sector in which our power is derived from oil and gas, solar and wind. However, even under the best case scenario, in which wind and solar and all the other renewable power sources meet their most optimistic growth projections, we know that fossil fuels will be essential to everyday life for decades to come.

While we recognize that there are no easy answers to the country’s energy demands, we do know that oil and gas are the fuels that power our nation’s economy. They enable us to drive to work each day and travel long distances, as well as provide energy for business and commerce, manufacturing and countless other industries. Without oil and gas, the entire U.S. economy would come to a grinding halt.

Unfortunately, opponents of domestic energy production are now using this tragic accident to enact a new moratorium on offshore energy production that will only cause more economic harm to our country. Clearly, both energy production safety and the national security that comes from a strong domestic oil sector are necessary to help Americans shed their dependence on foreign energy. Instead of saying no to domestic energy, we must instead commit to producing more of our own vast oil reserves with the highest standards of safety and accountability in oil production.

While you may hear over the next few weeks that it is easier to further limit domestic energy production in the U.S., remember that blocking new oil and gas exploration will only send more ocean tankers carrying foreign oil toward our coasts. Instead of giving up on another vital American industry because they are facing tremendous challenges, Americans must bravely face this difficult time and commit to the harder work of building responsible, reliable – and above all, safe – domestic energy resources.

The cost of energy: Reason prevails

Last week, CEA President David Holt weighed in on an online debate about the way the country and the energy industry should respond to the tragic accident last month in the Gulf of Mexico.

“We can only start this discussion with an honest, realistic approach of our needs as a country,” Holt said, adding that whatever one’s  personal position on this contentions issue, we all need to unite around “a reasonable and realistic starting point from which we can consider all the consequences of all the different options for energy production.”

Holt stressed that it does no good to protest all oil production, at a point in time when so much of our transportation sector and life in general is oil-dependent. And it likewise makes no sense to argue that the cost of domestic drilling is too high, while ignoring the multiple costs – environmental, political and financial — that result from a dependence on foreign oil production.

All energy production comes with costs and to pretend otherwise is dangerous. And while CEA supports a thorough investigation into the accident in the Gulf, and tougher standards to ensure this does not happen again, we are also encouraged to see that reason seems to be prevailing.

This opinion piece in USA Today argues that the U.S. cannot abandon offshore drilling now:

Decades of refusal to expand domestic drilling, or make gasoline more expensive, have left the nation addicted to foreign oil. As pretty much everyone knows by now, this is an invisible, slow motion disaster that transfers tens of billions of dollars a year to unfriendly regimes and leaves the nation vulnerable to wars and oil shocks.

This piece in The Washington Post calls for strict oversight, and responsible drilling, while The New York Times offers some context to the oil spills that have occurred in the U.S. To offer one example, Nigeria, one of the world’s major oil producers, has had a major spill every year since 1969; as of last year it had 2,000 active spills:

All oil comes from someone’s backyard, and when we don’t reduce the amount of oil we consume, and refuse to drill at home, we end up getting people to drill for us in Kazakhstan, Angola and Nigeria — places without America’s strong environmental safeguards or the resources to enforce them.

And finally, this poll shows that while public opinion has shifted in the wake of last month’s tragic accident, a majority of Americans continue to support offshore drilling in the U.S.

Clearly, until we know more about the cause of that accident and the best practices for ensuring it will not happen again, we must proceed with extreme caution. For the time, safety must be the first order of business. But as the country debates the best way to go forward, we are heartened to see such a levelheaded and intelligent debate.

CEA President David Holt Featured on EnergyTomorrow.org Podcast

David Holt, President of Consumer Energy Alliance, discussed his perspective on the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill with Jane Van Ryan of Energy Tomorrow Radio on May 17, 2010. The podcast of the interview may be heard here.

Consumer Energy Alliance and The Hispanic Institute Unite for Common Goals

CEA President: Balanced Energy Policy Good for All Consumers and Economic Sectors

HOUSTON — May 13, 2010   Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA) continues to maintain a well-rounded and extensive affiliate membership representing all economic sectors of the economy and segments of the population by growing its relationship with the The Hispanic Institute (THI), a non-profit organization that supports an informed and empowered Hispanic America, and advocates for knowledgeable decisions related to balanced American energy development.

Commenting on the organization’s continued affiliation with CEA, THI’s Board Chair Gus West said they are committed to the partnership and appreciate “CEA’s logical approach to energy policy.”

“We began working closely with the Consumer Energy Alliance in support of the Five-Year Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Leasing Program. THI secured letters of support from Hispanic federal, state and local elected officials as well as national NGO’s. CEA was out in front of this issue, and it speaks volumes that the current administration embraced CEA’s position. It demonstrates CEA’s logical approach to energy policy. We only hope that the energy industry realizes the significance of the work that CEA does and redoubles their support of this very important organization,” West explained.

The Hispanic Institute is focused on several ongoing projects beyond energy, including: study of Hispanic economic contributions; consumer fraud protection; citizenship education; and technology and telecommunications research. THI makes it a part of its mission to support organizations like CEA that promote policies that benefit all American consumers.

“The Hispanic Institute represents the best of America in its desire to promote education and economic growth. Consumer Energy Alliance has long appreciated the dedicated support of The Hispanic Institute to our alliance as we embrace our role as advocates for a balanced  U.S. energy policy together,” said CEA President David Holt.

For more information on The Hispanic Institute, visit www.thehispanicinstitute.net.

California wind power: Past and future

Most residents of northern California are familiar with the Altamont Pass Wind Farm,

a collection of almost 500 wind turbines that cover the hills about an hour east of San Francisco. When they were erected more than 30 years ago, they were one of the country’s first large-scale wind farms and symbolized a California experiment in an unproven technology. Today they are a popular landmark to road trippers and truck drivers emerging from the desert, as well as a symbol of the effective use of our natural resources.

So much has changed in recent decades, making wind power more high-tech, cost-effective and socially acceptable. And yet remarkably, there is still significant opposition to wind power in California, the state where, at least for those of us in the U.S. it all started.

The Bureau of Land Management is currently accepting comments on the proposed Granite Mountain Wind Project in California. CEA supports this project, which would generate enough power to supply up to 90,000 residents in and around San Bernardino, California. We ask that you visit the Call to Action

on our Web site and write to the Bureau of Land Management voicing your support.

For additional information on the proposed project, you can also visit the Granite Mountain Wind Web site. The project has been designed for minimal environmental impact so that the Granite Mountains will remain open to recreational uses, and the state-of-the art turbines that would be installed would rotate slowly and quietly so that there is no noise pollution to surrounding communities. At the same time, the proximity to transmission lines, would make it easier to convert and store the power generated, with minimal leakage.

As CEA recently outlined, the past couple of years have been very good for the wind power industry which installed more than 10,000 megawatts in 2009 alone. That momentum has continued in 2010, most notably with the approval of the Cape Wind project. But despite a near universal recognition of the benefits of wind power, projects around the country continue to be contested. Your support backing on this project and others that we will highlight in coming months will help convey to lawmakers the value of a multitude of small, medium- and large-scale projects around the country.

Cape Wind: Community Power

There is much to celebrate about the recent approval late last month of the Cape Wind project off the coast of Massachusetts.

And while much has already been said about what a milestone this is for the adoption of renewable power, there’s another key feature of this project that needs to be noted. The wind farm’s planned 130 turbines are expected to generate 1.6 billion kilowatts of electricity per year. That is about enough to power the majority of the homes on Nantucket and surrounding islands.

In other words, Cape Wind is one of those projects that will make an immediate difference in the surrounding community, providing residents with a reliable and nearby source of power and serving as a reminder of the vast natural resources that surround us.

Critics may say that’s not a lot of power, and they may question whether it was worth the long battle to win approval. We commend the communities that look for power right in their own backyards, as they say.

Recently CEA highlighted another such project, the first geothermal power plant in the state of Oregon.

It’s not big enough to make a dent in nationwide power demand, but will make a big difference for residents of the city of Klamath Falls.

When you think about finding the energy to power the entire nation, it can sound like a daunting challenge. Projects like these remind us that we can build a strong domestic energy industry by tapping all the diverse sources of power, all around the country.

David Holt: Let’s Start with a Realistic Discussion

The following op-ed from David Holt, President of Consumer Energy Alliance, appeared on the National Journal website here, in response to the discussion question “How can the U.S. wean itself off oil?”

May 10, 2010   We can only start this discussion with an honest, realistic approach of our needs as a country — those who would argue that oil is the only way forward, as well as those who protest all oil production (yet continue to drive cars, fly on airplanes) need to look at this not through the lens of the recent catastrophic spill, but through the lens of what we can do to address ALL of our needs: our energy requirements, our economic security, our environmental needs and safety concerns.
Let’s at least try to unite all sides of this debate and find a reasonable and realistic starting point from which we consider ALL the consequences of ALL the different options for energy production — from supply and cost to environmental impact and geopolitical impact — and weigh the risks and benefits of all.

At the Consumer Energy Alliance we recognize that there are NO EASY ANSWERS to the country’s energy demands and that all of our options have consequences. This is not to say that we cannot — or should not — strive to move toward a better future where more of our energy is derived from renewable sources But we also need to recognize that condemning all domestic oil production, without offering a viable alternative on the scale that is needed, helps no one.

CEA: Energy Not Merely “Incidental” to U.S. Relationship with Canada, But “Fundamental”

CEA joins State Department, Premier of Alberta, Top U.S. and Canadian Energy Experts for North American Energy Security Summit at Canadian Embassy

WASHINGTON May 7, 2010  America’s historic and ongoing partnership with Canada on issues related to energy security, affordability, and reliability is a “model” for other nations to follow, a senior advisor from the U.S. State Department said today at the Canadian Embassy – and according to Alberta premier Ed Stelmach, Canada stands ready, willing and eager to build upon that existing relationship and leverage those resources into jobs, security and opportunity on both sides of the border.

“Canada is our closest trading partner in the world, and our most important strategic ally in the hemisphere,” said Michael Whatley, vice president of Consumer Energy Alliance and a panelist at today’s summit. “Energy isn’t merely incidental to that relationship; it’s fundamental to it. No nation in the world sends more energy to the United States each day than Canada. And if we expect to have even a fighting chance at reducing our nation’s dangerous dependence on far-away, unstable energy in the future, Canadian energy will have to play an even more active role in helping us get there.”

This morning’s summit, hosted by the Center for North American Energy Security (CNAES) and held at the Canadian Embassy in Washington, D.C., drew the participation of a number of U.S. and Canadian experts on energy, the economy and the environment – addressing issues ranging from the capacity and permitting of local pipelines, to federal procurement rules for accessing oil sands-derived energy, all the way through to the political debate surrounding the Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), a policy that would severely restrict American access to secure and affordable sources of energy from Canada.

Addressing the summit earlier today, both Stelmach and senior U.S. State Department official David Goldwyn agreed that the energy resources made available to U.S. consumers today by way of the oil sands have strengthened our nations’ existing strategic partnership and contributed to robust economic development both in Canada and here in the United States. Stelmach additionally provided summit-goers with an update on the latest technological advances being deployed to develop the oil sands in an environmentally sensitive way, technology that has helped producers reduce the sands’ carbon emissions by nearly 40 percent over the past two decades.

Added Tom Corcoran, executive director of CNAES and a former member of Congress from Illinois: “As the energy and climate change debate continues to take shape in the U.S., policymakers should remember the 2.5 million barrels of petroleum Canada sends the United States each and every day — and the unique role that Canada plays both as America’s largest fuel supplier and its closest friend.”

The Scoop on Appliance Rebates

Did you know that many states are running programs that give Americans rebates on purchasing new energy efficient appliances for their homes? The deal is – only purchases that replace an existing appliance are eligible for a rebate, which range in benefit from $50 to $500. So get rid of that old energy-wasting fridge and upgrade to a new one that saves both energy and money!

Each state is running its own appliance rebate program and publishing its own rebate forms. Click here to find appliance rebates in your state. The rebate programs are funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, which is providing funding to all 50 states, five territories and the District of Columbia to develop and implement the programs.

What to do with that old appliance? Recycle it, of course! Recycling saves natural resources, conserves energy and is beneficial all the way around. Find out about appliance recycling programs in your state here.

View the State Appliance Rebate Database.
View information about recycling your old appliances.
Source: Energy Savers, U.S. Department of Energy

Home Landscaping to Maximize Energy

Did you know that the landscaping around your house can help you maximize energy efficiency and cut costs? In the U.S., there are four approximate climatic regions: temperate, hot-arid, hot-humid and cool. Depending on your region, there are numerous tips you can put to use to reduce your energy bills.

For instance, if you live in Alaska, you’re located in the cool region. In this region, dense windbreaks, such as tightly-planted evergreen trees, should be put in place to block winter winds. Those of you located in Florida are in the hot-humid region. In this region, homeowners should channel summer breezes to the home through planting positions.

Click here to discover landscaping tips for energy efficiency in your region.

Source: Energy Savers, U.S. Department of Energy