Why are People So Pumped About Pumped-storage Hydro?

Pumped Storage Reservoir

Wind and solar make most of the headline renewable news, but they aren’t the only ones. If you’ve ever wondered about the alternative and renewable energy sources available in the United States and what it will mean for the future of available American energy supply, wonder no more. There’s been an option quietly in use for decades.

One of those is pumped-storage hydropower or PSH. This type of hydropower started in the U.S. around 1960, with most of the infrastructure in use now built between 1970 and 1990. Most people associated dams with hydropower, but that’s not always the case. That’s because not all dams are built to produce electricity. Dams are often built to control river flow to mitigate flooding, increase river flow during dry seasons and improve navigation of the waterways for flood plains.

So read on for an introduction to one of the oldest large-scale energy storage systems in the United States and how it’s making a comeback – we’ll at least through word of mouth.

How Does Pumped-Storage Hydropower Work?

Pumped-storage hydropower creates a system where water is pumped from an upper reservoir to a lower reservoir through a closed-loop hydraulic system or through an open-loop hydraulic pump system. Both work by forcing water to move between storage areas that activate a turbine, which produces electricity that is stored and sent to a power grid for distribution and consumption.

In essence, these systems pump water into their upper reservoirs when electricity demand is lower – usually in the evenings. During periods of high electricity demand, the stored water is released downhill through turbines which create electricity in the same manner as a conventional hydro station. The turbine can also act as a pump, moving water back uphill, and the process repeats itself.

An open-loop system utilizes a natural body of water and a dam. A closed-loop system acts like a siphon that consists of an upper and lower reservoir that does not connect to or rely on a naturally flowing river, stream, or waterway.

It is the oldest method of producing electricity on a large scale and a perfect addition to wind and solar power initiatives because it can pick up the slack seasonally and during periods of intermittency with wind and sun. Of all of the operating hydropower facilities, pumped storage accounts for 95% of all utility-scale energy storage in the country, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.

Benefits & Drawbacks of Pumped Hydropower Storage

As states start to mandate cleaner energy, policymakers, developers, and community members will evaluate costs, land availability, and other issues associated with the buildout and development of large-scale renewable projects. Like any energy source, hydropower comes with its own set of potential challenges in terms of the engineering mentioned above issues to control river flow, land use, local hydrology, and weather, as well as associated costs. These are also similar issues with other clean energy sources.

But the benefits are unquestionable. States with access to or can build hydropower facilities, or related transmission infrastructure will have an excellent large-scale sustainable renewable energy source. It can act on-demand to meet challenges posed by the seasonality and intermittency of solar and wind while improving grid reliability and mitigating other service disruptions.

Current and Developing Hydroelectric Facilities within the United States

The United States currently has over 2000 hydroelectric facilities that have produced approximately 37% of our nation’s renewable energy and have accounted for 7.3% of the total energy generated for our power grids. Until last year, hydropower was the leading source of renewable generation before wind surpassed it.

Even though approximately one-third of the potential for hydroelectricity is currently underway in the United States, there remains a lack of available land and water resources to construct large power plants. There is potential in the future for smaller hydroelectric plants to be built to serve individual communities, but that is still being considered. In the meantime, states which border Canada have considered new transmission projects that would supply clean hydropower into their energy mix in an attempt to meet their energy goals. People often forget how intertwined and dependent the Canadian and U.S. energy grid and markets are on one another. The U.S. has been importing energy and hydropower from Canada for over a century. Those clean energy imports make up a significant percentage of the electric mix in the Northeast and New England.

As a large consumer of electricity, the United States is currently expanding its renewable energy sources by utilizing a blend of technologies. Hydroelectric power can exponentially increase the use and availability of renewable energy at a large scale by providing a source of electricity that does not require home and landowners to install solar panels or wind turbines.

As we collectively work to find a diverse mix of energy solutions that are cleaner and more affordable to meet the demands of our communities, scientists, surveyors, and stakeholder groups, we will need to come together around hydroelectric infrastructure development. When they do, we will be poised to dramatically increase the percentage of renewable energy used nationwide and at home.

Enbridge Line 5 Shutdown May Hit PA With $2.1B in Lost Economic Activity

Pennsylvania Farm

Consumer Energy Alliance requested an independent analysis on the impact a shutdown of the Line 5 pipeline would have in states across the Midwest which brought into focus the consequences for Pennsylvania.

Though CEA estimates that Ohio will bear the majority of the economic brunt, anticipating a $13.7 billion loss in economic activity, the report showed that Pennsylvania could potentially lose up to $2.1 billion in economic activity, $733 million in Gross State Product, and $34 million in state tax revenue. Additionally, Pennsylvania could lose 3,853 jobs and more than $331 million in labor income.

Read more – Pennsylvania Business Report

Irresponsible Politics: Line 5 Shutdown Threatens Thousands of Jobs in Canada, U.S.

Chemical manufacturing plant at night

CEA’s independent, third-party analysis on the importance of Line 5 was discussed in the context of mounting job losses in both the United States and Canada if the pipeline was shut down for political purposes.

Nearly 34,000 jobs could be lost in Ohio, Michigan, Indiana and Pennsylvania if Michigan closes the pipeline, according to a report Monday by the Houston, Texas-based Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA).

 

That’s in addition to estimates of up to 5,000 direct and 23,500 indirect jobs at risk in Ontario, plus more in Quebec.

Read more – EnergyNow

PA Bill Seeks to Block Towns From Banning Natural Gas Connections

Mother and Son Cooking

CEA Mid-Atlantic’s Mike Butler testified in support of legislation protecting consumer choice in Pennsylvania, ensuring that families and businesses have access to affordable and reliable supplies of natural gas.

Michael Butler, executive director of the regional chapter of the Consumer Energy Alliance, whose members include major energy companies and trade groups, said it is important for the Legislature to act before natural gas restrictions “take root” as they have in other places.

Read more – Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Pipeline Battle: Enbridge Defies Michigan Closure Orders

Stack of pipelines

Line 5 delivers energy that affordably fuels the lives and livelihoods of countless consumers, farmers and businesses across MichiganOhioIndiana, and Pennsylvania. The impact of which was brought to light by an independent, third-party analysis requested by CEA.

A study by the Consumer Energy Alliance estimates that closing Line 5 will result in a loss of 33,755 jobs and a minimum of $20.8 billion in economic activity across Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Indiana. The group also forecasts gross domestic product will be reduced by $8.3 billion.

Read more – Fox Business

Oil, Gas Industry Fuels Recovery While Reducing Emissions

Offshore energy production in the Gulf of Mexico

Recently, Consumer Energy Alliance looked at the environmental benefits that have accompanied the increased use of natural gas in Louisiana in our Louisiana Emissions Analysis and the positive impact it has had on families across the state.

According to Consumer Energy Alliance, America’s plentiful supply of natural gas helped reduce the average American’s household spending on energy 13.7 percent between 2008-2018. By comparison, household spending during this same time frame increased by 67 percent for health care, 34.5 percent for education and 23 percent for food costs. U.S. residents clearly enjoy one of the most affordable energy supplies in the world, and American energy exports will help bring electricity to 860 million people worldwide. Industry innovations are helping to meet the world’s growing energy demands.

Read more – Business and Industry Connection Magazine

National Energy and Environmental Group Testifies in Support of Pennsylvania Energy Consumer Protection Legislation

Mother and Son Cooking

Harrisburg, PA –  Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA), the leading energy and environmental advocate for families and businesses, today testified at a Pennsylvania Senate Environmental Resources and Local Government Committee hearing on Senate Bill 275, which would prohibit municipalities from adopting energy service bans. Following the committee hearing, CEA Mid-Atlantic Director Mike Butler released the following statement:

“CEA strongly supports SB 275 and thanks Senator Yaw for introducing this common-sense legislation that will ensure Pennsylvania consumers can continue to choose to have access to affordable, reliable energy in their homes and businesses.”

“Across the country, we have witnessed an increase in irresponsible policies put forth by local governments that would have unintended consequences of increasing prices while failing to achieve environmental goals. The irony is that the groups supporting these harmful mandates ignore the tremendous air quality improvements and carbon reduction benefits that natural gas has provided our country and Pennsylvania. In fact, a 2019 CEA study found that while energy production soared by nearly 3,000 percent in Pennsylvania, our emissions have dropped by 92 percent. Utilizing natural gas, coupled with renewable sources, is leading us to a cleaner energy future with lower emissions.”

Natural gas provides heat to half of all Pennsylvania households – more than any other fuel source. Misguided attempts to ban natural gas by forcing mandates onto consumers will not only lead to increased energy prices, but will require households to replace major appliances like hot water heaters, furnaces, gas stoves and dryers, and install a heat pump. Along with the equipment and other wiring and labor costs, these updates could top out at more than $20,000 for an average Pennsylvania homeowner – a cost burden that could be devastating for many families and small businesses.”

“Pennsylvania joins 11 other states that have either passed or are pursuing similar common-sense, pro-consumer, pro-energy legislation this year. Pennsylvanians should be able to decide what types of appliances they want, not fringe anti-energy activists. We urge Pennsylvania Senate members to consider this common-sense consumer protection measure to help get our state to a cleaner future, and protect our families, seniors and businesses’ right to make their own energy choices.”

###

About Consumer Energy Alliance
Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA) is the leading voice for sensible energy and environmental policies for consumers, bringing together families, farmers, small businesses, distributors, producers, and manufacturers to support America’s environmentally sustainable energy future. With more than 550,000 members nationwide, we are committed to leading the nation’s dialogue around energy, its critical role in the economy, and how it supports the vital supply chains for the families and businesses that depend on them. CEA works daily to encourage communities across the nation to seek sensible, realistic, and environmentally responsible solutions to meet our nation’s energy needs.

Contact:
Bryson Hull
(202) 657-2855
bhull@consumerenergyalliance.org

 

Hydropower: The Hidden Gem of Renewable Energy Generation

As the latest energy and climate debate continue, Consumer Energy Alliance remains an advocate for shining light on the challenges ahead for implementing various proposed state and federal renewable energy policy proposals and carbon reduction requirements in a manner that ensures that our grid remains reliable and will not put downward pressure on the budgets of families and small businesses.

Interestingly, while these ongoing renewable energy debates continue, there is an energy source that has been a hidden gem. Though it’s been around for almost 2,000 years, hydropower generation has been almost completely left out of most major renewable energy conversations.

So, why haven’t we talked more about it?

As its name refers, hydropower generation uses the flow of water, from a reservoir or river, to turn a turbine linked to a power generator. As water flows past the turbine, it turns a shaft leading to the generator and generates electricity. Thousands of years ago, people used hydropower to turn paddle wheels on rivers to grind grain, and prior to the availability of electricity in the U.S., mills were powered directly with hydropower.

In fact, hydropower was one of the first sources of energy used for electricity generation, and until 2019, hydropower was the largest source of total annual U.S. renewable electricity generation. In the U.S. in 2020, hydroelectricity accounted for about 7.3% of total U.S. utility-scale electricity generation and 37% of total utility-scale renewable electricity generation.

While the International Energy Agency (IEA) has stated that hydropower is expected to remain the world’s largest source of renewable energy generation, most Americans have probably seen some form of hydropower generation without even realizing it.

Where is Hydropower?

hydro electricitySince you need water for hydropower generation, the facilities are usually located on or near a water source. Conventional hydroelectric facilities include systems where the force of a river’s current applies pressure on a turbine to generate power or where water accumulates in a reservoir created by dams on streams and rivers and is released through the turbines to generate electricity. Meanwhile, pumped-storage hydropower facilities are a type of hydro-storage system where water is pumped from a water source up to a storage reservoir and is released from it to power hydro turbines located below. However, the electricity for pumping to storage may be supplied by hydro turbines or by other types of power plants including traditional fuel or nuclear power plants, when demand costs are low or peak electricity demand increases and power is needed. Pumped storage can be especially beneficial to provide on-demand energy to meet the intermittency and seasonality of renewables like solar and wind as well as dispatchable power to the grid during an outage or disruption.

There are currently about 1,450 conventional and 40 pumped-storage hydropower plants operating in the United States, with most hydropower generation capacity located in the Western part of the United States. However, there are conventional hydropower and hydroelectric facilities in nearly every state.

Most U.S. hydropower is produced at large dams on major rivers, and most of them were built before the mid-1970s by federal government agencies. The largest U.S. hydropower facility, and the largest U.S. electric power plant in generation capacity, is the Grand Coulee hydro dam on the Columbia River in Washington with 6,765 MW total generation capacity. New York has the largest conventional hydroelectricity generation capacity of all states east of the Mississippi River, followed by Alabama.

rocket man
View of the thrusters of a rocket engine

In 2020, the total U.S. conventional hydroelectricity net summer generation capacity was 79,946 megawatts (MW)—or about 80 million kilowatts. Almost two-thirds of the energy it took the Saturn V rocket to send a man to the moon.

Hydropower’s Outlook

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that the share of renewables in the U.S. electricity generation mix will increase from 21% in 2020 to 42% in 2050 – which includes hydropower.

As policymakers continue to discuss sensible energy and environmental solutions for the future, large-scale hydropower will have to be included in the dialogue. A quick and cost-effective way to bring substantial supplies of emissions-free energy in the near term through additional hydropower capacity can help to ensure American families and small businesses have access to reliable, affordable power that can integrate and optimize with other long-term renewable energy options and technologies.

With so many clean and affordable energy choices – like hydropower – available to Americans, we hope you will join CEA’s discussion about common sense, solutions-oriented policies that are a win for consumers’ bottom lines, the electricity grid, and the environment.

 

The Guy Gordon Show with Chris Ventura

Mother and little son in the car reading

CEA Midwest Executive Director Chris Ventura spoke with Guy Gordon on WJR 760 about the importance of Line 5 to the economies of Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and other states across the Midwest.

Listen here – The Guy Gordon Show on WJR 760

Line 5 Shutdown Would Cause at Least $20.8B in Losses to Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania, Analysis Finds

People Walking In Hallway

Consumer Energy Alliance Releases Report Highlighting Economic Impacts to Midwest and Great Lakes Consumers from Reckless Line 5 Closure

LANSING, MI – An unnecessary and premature shutdown of the Line 5 pipeline risks at least 33,000 jobs and a minimum of $20.8 billion in economic losses to consumers in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania, an independent third-party analysis requested by Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA) finds.

Weinstein, Clower and Associates used the IMPLAN economic input-output model to examine the potential economic losses and business disruptions those states, others nearby and Canadian provinces would sustain as a result of the closure of Enbridge’s Line 5, a vital piece of regional energy infrastructure.

Shockingly, two-thirds of the losses, or $13.7 billion, would come from Ohio. That is more than four times the impact to Michigan, according to the study.

The modeled losses likely understate the real-world impact because the study does not examine several other avenues of knock-on economic effects which will add to the total economic damage. These include expected upward pressure on fuel prices for consumers for gasoline and home heating; commercial trucking and aviation users; and farmers whose fertilizers rely on the feedstock carried by Line 5. Higher fuel prices across the board translate to more expensive costs to consumers.

The report estimated the following regional and state level economic losses (MI, OH, IN, PA):

  • $20.8 billion loss in economic activity;
  • $8.3 billion reduction in combined Gross State Product;
  • $2.36 billion foregone labor earnings in salaries, wages and benefits;
  • 33,755 lost jobs; and
  • $265.7 million lower annual state tax revenues.

“Line 5 delivers energy that affordably fuels the lives and livelihoods of countless consumers, farmers and businesses across Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania. After enduring decades of economic and job-creation challenges, CEA is concerned that the reckless and arbitrary action by Governor Whitmer to shut down Line 5 could halt the region’s positive progress and further erode our economic competitiveness,” CEA Midwest Executive Director Chris Ventura said.

“If Line 5 is shut down, the region – with Ohio bearing the highest economic burden – will see job losses, diminished tax receipts and higher energy costs. Our region cannot afford to send people and good-paying jobs to other parts of the country. A shutdown of Line 5 would be bad for the Midwest’s economy and harmful to U.S.-Canadian relations. Instead of closing Line 5, our leaders should acknowledge the necessity of continuing to use the safest, most environmentally responsible way to transport energy while providing additional environmental protections for our Great Lakes by supporting the Line 5 Tunnel Project.”

“While Governor Whitmer may enjoy shutting down her state’s economy for political purposes, families and small businesses across the region and Canada deserve better.  We hope Michigan’s governor wakes up to the fact that her irresponsible opposition to Line 5 will destroy the lives and livelihoods of tens of thousands of families, and actually do more harm to the environment.  It is time to come together to build the Line 5 Tunnel Project so our families and businesses can continue to receive the life-sustaining energy we need, in the safest and most environmentally responsible way possible.”

###

About Consumer Energy Alliance
Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA) is the leading voice for sensible energy and environmental policies for consumers, bringing together families, farmers, small businesses, distributors, producers, and manufacturers to support America’s environmentally sustainable energy future. With more than 550,000 members nationwide, we are committed to leading the nation’s dialogue around energy, its critical role in the economy, and how it supports the vital supply chains for the families and businesses that depend on them. CEA works daily to encourage communities across the nation to seek sensible, realistic, and environmentally responsible solutions to meet our nation’s energy needs.

Contact:
Bryson Hull
(202) 657-2855
bhull@consumerenergyalliance.org